Table 2.

Rationale for Study Exclusion After Full-Text Review

Author	Date	Country	Design	Rationale
Stava CJ, Lopez A, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R	2006	United States	Cross-sectional	This study explored prevalence of specific health and psychosocial problems but did not actually measure DDA using a standardized tool
Wilson KG, Chochinov HM, Skirko MG, et al.	2007	Canada	Cross-sectional	Demographics showed that an insignificant number of participants included in the study fit the AYA demographic
Neilson K, Pollard A, Boonzaier A, et al.	2013	Australia	Longitudinal	Demographic table showed that there were fewer than five people included in the study that fit the AYA demographic
Kim J-H, Yoon S, Won W-Y, et al.	2013	South Korea	Cross-sectional	Performance status was primary outcome and DDA were used as independent variables predicting performance status
Giese-Davis J, Waller A, Carlson LE, et al.	2012	Canada	Longitudinal	Depression and anxiety were not primary outcomes and only used for correlations with number of practical and psychosocial problems
Fossa SD, Dahl AA, Loge JH	2003	Norway	Cross-sectional	Depression and anxiety were not primary outcomes and only used as independent variables predicting chronic fatigue