Table 4.
Identified Theme | Description | N* |
---|---|---|
Deep Structure | 202 | |
1. Variations in the environment | The environment of healthcare is defined by factors that influence the adoption and use of HIT, including provider location, size, and HIT vendor capabilities. | 85 |
2. Market Complexity | Healthcare operates within a complex environment characterized by patient confusion, multiple social interactions, data complexity and complex reimbursement systems. | 27 |
3. Regulatory | Regulations guide privacy and security, reporting, reimbursement, liability and standards. | 43 |
4. Flawed Risk and Reward | Incentives to adopt HIT are flawed; inure more to payers and patients than to providers adopting the systems. Fee-for-service reimbursement norms create further disincentives. | 24 |
5. Theories of Acceptance and Diffusion | Several models help describe the patterns of adoption and diffusion of technology within healthcare, including the Technology Acceptance Model and the Diffusion of Innovation theory among others. | 27 |
Equilibrium | 224 | |
6. Barriers | Data sources highlighted the cost of HIT, lack of human and capital resources, and resistance to change from practitioners as barriers to transformation. | 134 |
7. Ethical Considerations | Ethical considerations contributing to equilibrium include an obligation for technology to do no harm, benefit everyone and not limit ability to practice autonomously. | 5 |
8. Competition and Sustainability | The market economy of the US demands a value driven business case for HIT adoption. | 34 |
Revolution | 147 | |
9. Environmental Elements | Patient engagement and new models of care represent potential influencers of revolution within healthcare. | 74 |
10. Internal Elements | Change requires effective management, practitioner champions, a shared vision, and a favorable organizational culture. | 66 |
Data sources can reflect more than one PEq component or theme and not all data sources discussed a specific identified theme.