Table 3.
Unique existing evaluation metrics pertinent to referral, consultation and Integrated eCR systems, by domain
Operational | Scheduling | Clinical | Communication | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Referral | • Percent of referrals completed electronically vs. fax/paper | • Percent of eReferral slots used | • Patient follow-up by electronic vs. paper/fax referral | |
• Disposition (scheduled vs not scheduled) as determined by referral management department | • Slot availability for eReferred-patients | |||
• Wait time for specialty service by insurance status | ||||
Consultation and integrated eCR | • Time to first specialist response | • Self-reported PCP ability to manage a patient with specialist guidance | • Specialist satisfaction | |
• Disposition (e.g., scheduled immediately, scheduled after review, consultation only) as determined by specialist reviewer | • Emergency department utilization | • PCP expectation for referral | ||
• Time spent by specialist | • Cardiac outcomes: appropriate diagnoses, percent of patients with blood pressure control, PCP prescription of guideline-conoirdance cardiovascular medicationsa | • Quality of PCP referral | ||
• Economic impact of provider reimbursement strategy | • Specialty clinic complexitya | • Quality of specialist response | ||
• Patient leakage to other health systems for specialty care | • Number of exchanges per consult | |||
• Primary care clinic adoption of systema | • Number of consults with document uploadsa |
aDenotes metrics that were only examined among integrated eCR systems