Skip to main content
. 2015 May 28;28(1):7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.05.005

Table 2.

Percentage of Cardiology Participants (n = 47), Emergency Medicine Participants (n = 50), and Other Participants (n = 9) Providing Each Response to Perceptions of Ambulance Services Items (N = 106).

Very Unsatisfied Somewhat Unsatisfied Neutral Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied p
How satisfied are you with the current ambulance services level of care given to Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients? Cardiology 2.1 23.4 31.9 29.8 12.8 0.06
Emergency medicine 12.0 8.0 42.0 36.0 2.0
Other 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 0.0
Total 6.6 15.1 36.8 34.9 6.6



Item Group Very Unlikely Somewhat Unlikely Neutral Somewhat Likely Very Likely p

If a patient with a cardiac emergency contacts you directly, how likely are you to advise that them to use the ambulance services to go to hospital? Cardiology 2.1 6.4 8.5 27.7 55.3 0.43
Emergency medicine 2.0 0.0 6.0 16.0 76.0
Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8
Total 1.9 2.8 6.6 21.7 67.0



How likely are you to use the ambulance services for you or your family, if a cardiac emergency occurs? Cardiology 10.6 6.4 17.0 25.5 40.4 0.25
Emergency medicine 10.0 10.0 28.0 14.0 38.0
Other 0.0 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3
Total 9.4 7.5 21.7 22.6 38.7

Notes: Table entries are percentages. p values are from chi-square tests of independence. Medians are presented in bold.