Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gut. 2015 Mar 12;65(3):447–455. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308835

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and positive likelihood ration (LR+) of HRAM for diagnosis dyssynergic subtypes and FDD.

Line-plot patterns Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV LR+

Abnormal 94.1 12.9 51.9 68.8 1.1
Type I dyssynergia 20.0 63.5 35.4 44.3 0.6
Type II dyssynergia 4.7 91.8 36.4 49.1 0.6
Type III dyssynergia 16.5 84.7 51.9 50.3 1.1
Type IV dyssynergia 45.9 80.0 69.6 59.6 2.3
Types I–IV (FAR) 87.1 20.0 52.1 60.1 1.1
Types II + IV (FDD) 50.6 71.8 64.2 59.2 1.8

FAR: failed anal relaxation; FDD: functional defecation disorder.

All values, except LR+, expressed as percentages.