Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;55(12):901–906. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0209

Table 2.

Comparison of features and outcomes between hybrid assistive limb (HAL) and N-HAL groups

HAL group (N = 14) N-HAL group (N = 77) P value
Age 65 (57–69) 64 (57–75) 0.865
Sex (male) 5 (35.7%) 43 (55.8%) 0.245
NIHSS 15 (9–30) 11 (4–20) 0.098
GCS 14 (11–15) 14 (9–15) 0.829
Amount of hematoma (mL) 19.87 (6.98–38.39) 15.64 (5.84–33.74) 0.708
Site of hematoma 0.731
  subcortical 2 (14.2%) 23 (29.9%)
  putamen 4 (28.6%) 21 (27.2%)
  thalamus 5 (35.7%) 18 (23.3%)
  mixed 2 (14.2%) 9 (11.7%)
  other 1 (7.1%) 6 (7.8%)
Presence of ventricular hematoma 4 (28.6%) 24 (31.2%) 1
  side of hematoma 0.272
  right 11 (78.6%) 41 (53.2%)
  left 3 (21.4%) 35 (45.5%)
  both 0 (0%) 1 (1.3%)
  operation 8 (57.1%) 43 (55.8%) 1
Hospital stay of ours (days) 21 (17–30) 13 (9–19) 0.001
  BI ≥ 85 7 (50%) 40 (51.9%) 1
  FIM ≥ 110 9 (64.3%) 31 (40.3%) 0.143
Br. stage of upper extremities 5 (3–6) 4 (2–6) 0.778
Br. stage of hand function 5 (3–6) 4 (2–6) 0.827
Br. stage of lower extremities 5 (3–6) 5 (3–6) 0.971
Home discharge from a neighboring hospital 11 (78.6%) 44 (57.1%) 0.152
Hospital stay of a neighboring hospital (days) 163 (66–196) 110 (50–164) 0.164
Total hospital stay from ours to a neighboring one 186 (94–218) 123 (62–182) 0.081

BI: Barthel index, Br: Brunnstrom, FIM: functional independence measure, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale, HAL: hybrid assistive limb, NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.