Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;55(12):901–906. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0209

Table 3.

Comparison of features and outcomes of patients with right intracranial hemorrhage between hybrid assistive limb (HAL) and N-HAL groups

HAL group (N = 11) N-HAL group (N = 41) P value
Age 64 (56–69) 64 (56–77) 0.56
Sex (male) 3 (27.3%) 22 (53.7%) 0.177
NIHSS 14 (8–28) 11 (5–16) 0.269
GCS 14 (12–15) 14 (10–15) 0.549
Amount of hematoma (mL) 19.98 (4.58–35.28) 15.64 (6.18–33.5) 0.902
Site of hematoma 0.932
  subcortical 2 (18.2%) 13 (31.7%)
  putamen 3 (27.3%) 9 (22.0%)
  thalamus 4 (36.4%) 12 (29.3%)
  mixed 1 (9.1%) 3 (7.3%)
  other 1 (9.1%) 4 (9.8%)
Presence of ventricular hematoma 2 (18.2%) 15 (36.6%) 0.304
Operation 5 (45.5%) 24 (58.5%) 0.507
Hospital stay of ours (days) 22 (16–30) 13 (9–18) 0.003
  BI ≥ 85 7 (63.6%) 20 (48.8%) 0.503
  FIM ≥ 110 9 (81.8%) 18 (43.9%) 0.04
Br. stage of upper extremities 6 (4–6) 4 (2–6) 0.165
Br. stage of hand function 5 (4–6) 4 (2–6) 0.2
Br. stage of lower extremities 6 (4–6) 4 (3–6) 0.221
Home discharge from a neighboring hospital 9 (81.8%) 25 (61.0%) 0.291
Hospital stay of a neighboring hospital 119 (58–179) 113 (61–180) 0.937
Total hospital stay from ours to a neighboring one 138 (73–209) 132 (73–197) 0.762

BI: Barthel index, Br: Brunnstrom, FIM: functional independence measure, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale, HAL: hybrid assistive limb, NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.