Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;22:1156–1163. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4676-z

Table 2.

Type of liver resection and pathologic characteristics

Characteristic PTBD (n = 88) EBD only (n = 157) P
Preoperative cytology assessment, n (%) 0.40
Positive or suspicious 49 (55.7) 93 (59.2)
Negative 18 (20.4) 39 (24.8)
Not performed 21 (23.9) 25 (15.9)
Type of liver resection, n (%) 0.003
Extrahepatic bile duct resection only 10 (11.4) 38 (24.2)
Segment 4/5 wedge resection 3 (3.4) 17 (10.8)
Mesohepatectomy 2 (2.3) 0 (0)
Left hemihepatectomy 22 (25.0) 34 (21.7)
Left extended hemihepatectomy 8 (9.1) 12 (7.6)
Right hemihepatectomy 5 (5.7) 17 (10.8)
Right extended hemihepatectomy 38 (43.2) 39 (24.8)
Resection including caudate lobea 46 (61.3) 63 (61.8) 0.08
Resection specimen, n (%)
T3 or T4 tumor (AJCC 7th edition) 34 (38.6) 31 (19.7) 0.002
R1 resection 21 (23.9) 49 (31.2) 0.24
Moderate/poor differentiation 22 (25.0) 33 (21.0) 0.52
Perineural invasion 70 (79.5) 108 (68.8) 0.08
Resected lymph nodes
Total lymph node count, median (range) 3 (1–22) 4 (1–20) 0.15
N1 lymph node metastasis, n (%) 30 (34.1) 35 (22.3) 0.05
Mean lymph node ratio (positive/negative) 0.14 (1/7) 0.09 (1/11) 0.03

PTBD percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, EBD endoscopic biliary drainage, AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer

a Percentage of caudate resections only concerns patients who underwent meso- or hemihepatectomy