Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 22;9:160. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00160

Table 5.

Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the different criteria.

C0 C1 C2 C3 C5
CC1 vs. CC2 0.80 0.74 0.78 0.81 0.73
CI: [0.66; 0.95] CI: [0.63; 0.86] CI: [0.68; 0.89] CI: [0.71; 0.90] CI: [0.58; 0.88]
FC1 vs. FC2 0.89 0.71 0.82 0.87 0.87
CI: [0.78; 0.99] CI: [0.59; 0.83] CI: [0.70; 0.93] CI: [0.76; 0.92] CI: [0.76; 0.98]
CC1 vs. FC1 0.79 0.64 0.81 0.86 0.86
CI: [0.63; 0.94] CI: [0.52;0.76] CI: [0.72; 0.91] CI: [0.78; 0.94] CI: [0.75; 0.97]
CC2 vs. FC2 0.87 0.82 0.88 0.87 0.80
CI: [0.75; 0.99] CI: [0.72; 0.92] CI: [0.81; 0.96] CI: [0.80; 0.95] CI: [0.66; 0.94]

CC1, first evaluation of observer CC; CC2, second evaluation of the observer CC; FC1, first evaluation of observer FC; FC2, second evaluation of the observer FC; CI, Confidence Interval at 95%. Kappa tests for C0 and C5. Weighted kappa tests for C1, C2, and C3. Confidence intervals (CI) are at 95%.