Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 21;16:1088. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2317-3

Table 3.

Methylation motifs of C. coli BFR-CA-9557

No. Motif Modified Position Modification Type % Motifs Detected # of Motifs Detected # of Motifs in Genome Mean Modi-fication QV1 Mean Motif Coverage Partner Motif
A RAATTY 3 m6A 98.67 27795 28170 309.40 235.73 RAATTY
B GATC 2 m6A 99.66 7512 7538 344.25 257.15 GATC
C RCATC 3 m6A 99.43 4381 4406 274.48 256.54
D CAAGAA 6 m6A 99.71 2069 2075 290.35 249.45
E GGGTDA 6 m6A 99.44 1607 1616 327.70 254.15
F DACATTGB 4 m6A 69.69 223 320 80.60 255.05
G1 TAAANNNNNGTG 3 m6A 99.75 392 393 271.96 259.91 CACNNNNNTTTA
G2 CACNNNNNTTTA 2 m6A 99.75 392 393 331.81 263.02 TAAANNNNNGTG
H1 CAAYNNNNNNNTTYG 3 m6A 99.58 237 238 316.89 246.49 CRAANNNNNNNRTTG
H2 CRAANNNNNNNRTTG 4 m6A 99.58 237 238 276.97 247.15 CAAYNNNNNNNTTYG

1 QV = quality value

Methylation motifs were identified using the PacBio SMRT Analysis software (see Methods). Column 2 shows the sequence consensus of the motif, whereby non-uniform positions are represented by IUPAC ambiguity codes. Column 3 and 4 denote the position of the modified base within the motif and the type of methylation. Column 5 represents the fraction of a motif’s occurrences in the genome (column 7) for which a methylation has been detected (column 6). Column 8 and 9 denote the average modification quality (in Phred Q-scores) and average coverage of motifs detected as modified. The last column shows the partner motif, i.e. the reverse complement of the motif