Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 21;15:991. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1991-5

Table 1.

Baseline patient data and univariate analysis of factors associated with survival at 60 months

Type Group Subgroup Survivor (N = 77) Deceased (N = 30) P value
Demographic data Age (years) 59.65 ± 12.75 58.27 ± 12.58 0.614
Gender Male 50 (64.9 %) 21 (70 %) 0.618*
Female 27 (35.1 %) 9 (30 %)
Pathologic factors Colorectum Colon cancer 45 (58.4 %) 15 (50 %) 0.389*
Rectal cancer 31 (40.3 %) 15 (50 %)
Tumor size (cm) 5.0 (2.0, 10.0) 3.7 (1.0, 10.0) 0.017
TNM stage Tis 2 (2.6 %) 0 <0.001*
I 15 (19.5 %) 0
IIA 21 (27.3 %) 1 (3.3 %)
IIB 10 (13.0 %) 2 (6.7 %)
III 24 (31.2 %) 14 (46.7 %)
IV 5 (6.5 %) 13 (43.3 %)
Histologic type Adenocarcinoma 67 (87.0 %) 26 (86.7 %) 0.436*
Mucinous adenocarcinoma 3 (3.9 %) 3 (10.0 %)
Signet ring cell carcinoma 1 (1.3 %) 0
Adenocarcinoma with component of mucinous adenocarcinoma 3 (3.9 %) 1 (3.3 %)
Adenocarcinoma with component of signet ring cell carcinoma 1 (1.3 %) 0
Other 2 (2.6 %) 0
Differentiation degree Well differentiated 4 (5.2 %) 0 0.054*
Well or moderately differentiated 4 (5.2 %) 0
Moderately differentiated 54 (70.1 %) 24 (80.0 %)
Moderately or poorly differentiated 8 (10.4 %) 3 (10.0 %)
Poorly differentiated 5 (6.5 %) 1 (3.3 %)
Undifferentiated 1 (1.3 %) 1 (3.3 %)
Nodal metastasis 0 (0,12) 2 (0,9) 0.01
Ratio of nodal metastasis to retrieved nodes 0 % (0 %, 100 %) 8.93 % (0, 100) 0.03
Immunohistochemical factors PCNA 60 % (0 %, 95 %) 52.5 % (10, 85) 0.129
nm23 0 = "(–)" 9 (11.7 %) 5 (16.7 %) 0.65*
1 = "(±)" 11 (14.3 %) 2 (6.7 %)
2 = "(+)" 51 (66.2 %) 22 (73.3 %)
3 = "(++)" 2 (2.6 %) 0
4 = "(+++)" 4 (5.2 %) 1 (3.3 %)
Cyclin D1 0 = "(–)" 14 (18.2 %) 3 (10.0 %) 0.03*
1 = "(±)" 28 (36.4 %) 5 (16.7 %)
2 = "(+)" 31 (40.3 %0 15 (50.0 %)
3 = "(++)" 3 (3.9 %) 6 (20.0 %)
4 = "(+++)" 1 (1.3 %) 1 (3.3 %)
Ki67 50 (0,95) 45 (5,90) 0.908
Maximum standardized uptake value SUVmax 9.8 (4.4, 24.7) 13.6 (3.2, 34.2) <0.001

There is one missing number in “Colon or Rectal cancer” in the survivor group. And each group had a missing in “Differentiation degree”

*Means data was shown in number (percentage) and analyzed by Chi-square test. And the other data are all shown in median (minimum, maximum) and analyzed by ANOVA