Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 21;15:1263. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2599-z

Table 3.

Linear regression analyses between psychosocial variables and expected RTW in weeks (X→Y)

All Men Women
β (95 % CI) p-value β (95 % CI) p-value β (95 % CI) p-value
Job demand-control
 Model 1
  High strain 2.8 (1.7–4.0) <.0001 3.1 (1.8–4.4) <.0001 1.6 ((−1.2)–4.5) 0.3
  Active 0.7 ((−0.8)–2.2) 0.4 0.5 ((−1.1)–2.2) 0.5 1.7 ((−2.7)–6.1) 0.4
  Passive 1.3 (0.1–2.5) 0.03 1.3 (0.01–2.6) 0.05 0.9 ((−2.2)–4.0) 0.6
  Low strain (REF) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Model 2
  High strain 2.1 (1.0–3.2) 0.003 2.4 (1.1–3.6) 0.0002 0.7 ((−2.3)–3.6) 0.7
  Active 0.6 ((−0.8)–2.1) 0.4 0.5 ((−1.0)–2.1) 0.8 −0.3 ((−4.6)–4.0) 0.9
  Passive 0.9 ((−0.2)–2.0) 0.6 1.0 ((−0.2)–2.3) 0.1 −0.1 ((−3.2)–3.0) 0.9
  Low strain (REF) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Effort-reward imbalance
 Model 1 1.1 (0.6–1.5) <.0001 1.1 (0.5–1.6) 0.0001 0.8 ((−0.1)–1.8) 0.09
 Model 2 0.7 (0.3–1.2) 0.002 0.8 (0.2–1.3) 0.006 0.3 ((−0.7)–1.3) 0.5

95 % CI = 95 % confidence interval

Model 1 Unadjusted; Model 2 Adjusted for Occupational status, self-efficacy and general mental health