Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 30;112(50):E7003–E7012. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513843112

Table 1.

Response of ADP-stimulated contraction with cMyBPC and control antibodies

Sample Before After ns
N′ cMyBPC ab (2.2 μm) N′ cMyBPC ab (2.2 μm)
IDCM n = 4, n = 11
 ADP–Fact, kN/m2  8.4 ± 1.0  6.6 ± 0.9*
 ADP–Fpass, kN/m2  0.36 ± 0.1  0.33 ± 0.1
Nucleolar ab (2.2 μm) Nucleolar ab (2.2 μm) n = 3, n = 8
IDCM
 ADP–Fact, kN/m2  9.3 ± 1.1  9.0 ± 1.0
 ADP–Fpass, kN/m2  0.57 ± 0.1  0.50 ± 0.1
C′ cMyBPC ab (2.2 μm) C′ cMyBPC ab (2.2 μm) n = 3, n = 11
IDCM
 ADP–Fact, kN/m2  11.7 ± 1.9  10.8 ± 2.0
 ADP–Fpass, kN/m2  1.5 ± 0.3  1.2 ± 0.2*

Paired-samples t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant; *vs. before antibodies. C′ cMyBPC or nucleolar antibody served as controls for unspecific binding. ab, antibody; ADP–Fact, ADP total tension (10 mM ADP); ADP–Fpass, ADP passive tension; cMyBPC, cardiac myosin-binding protein C; IDCM, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; N, number of samples; n, number of cardiomyocytes; 2.2-μm sarcomere length.