Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 30;112(50):15510–15515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509321112

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Areas in which speech–print convergence differed for alphabetic orthographies (Spanish, English, Hebrew) compared independently with the logographic orthography (Chinese), each comparison P < 0.05, corrected. Areas shown in blue showed greater convergence for the logographic than the alphabetic orthographies; areas in red showed the opposite pattern. Areas in yellow provide a reference to the reading circuit identified by published meta-analyses.