Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 22.
Published in final edited form as: Engineering (Beijing). 2015 Oct 16;1(3):324–335. doi: 10.15302/J-ENG-2015072

Figure 3. Microfluidic lysis of whole blood samples.

Figure 3

(a) Diagram of the microfluidic device with bright-field microscopy at various points in the channel with their approximate locations indicated. (b) A comparison of threshold time at three virus concentrations for chip-lysed versus pipette-lysed samples containing whole virus particles. These data verify that the microfluidic lysis method does not result in significant differences in signal compared to the manual method.