Table 3.

piRNA clusters expression in Rpp30 ^18.2 mutants

Fold change Rpp30 versus white virgins from RNA‐seq data
piRNA cluster number	Log2 fold change	P‐value	Chromosome
19	1.75	6.54E‐05	X
8	0.66	0.0099094	X
2	−0.95	1.70E‐05	X
62	−1.5	0.0017961	2L
5	−0.8	0.0098801	2L
35	−0.89	0.0036137	2LHet
1	−2.26	3.02E‐41	2R
56	−1.49	0.0003018	2R
142	−0.86	0.0004981	2R
97	−2.09	0.0034424	2R
6	−1.16	4.25E‐06	3L
32	−1.52	0.0026484	3L
26	−1.34	4.02E‐09	3LHet
15	−1.36	1.45E‐06	3LHet
44	−1.78	2.67E‐05	3LHet
34	−1.53	0.000248	3LHet
12	−1.14	0.0003177	3LHet
24	−1.2	0.0011207	3LHet
57	−0.89	0.0035816	3LHet
72	−0.99	0.0036892	3LHet
59	−2.11	1.53E‐09	3RHet
37	−2.06	8.50E‐07	3RHet
16	−1.47	0.0004072	3RHet
29	−1.28	0.0001272	4
43	−2.72	2.12E‐09	U
10	−0.93	0.0009059	U
7	−1.69	0.0020243	U
94	−1.66	0.0021603	U
68	−1.38	0.0024001	U
77	−1.16	0.0034278	U
74	−1.8	0.0040003	U
14	−1.08	0.0066757	U

piRNA clusters highlighted in Figure 4B are shown in bold.

The normalized fold change, the P‐value, and the chromosome localization of the piRNA clusters that are affected in Rpp30 ^18.2 mutants ovaries over white virgin transcriptome RNA‐seq analysis.