Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2015 Jun 24;58(13):5208–5217. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00092

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Thermodynamic characterization of the fragment binding. (A) Histogram of the ΔH (open bars), −TΔS (filled bars), and ΔG (hatched bars). Negative values are favorable for binding. (B) Plot analyzing the enthalpic and entropic components of the binding energy and predictable enthalpy−entropy compensation. The binding of F5 is enthalpy driven; the binding of other fragments is enthalpy−entropy driven.