Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2015 Jul 27;36(25):1859–1873. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24011

Table 11.

Summary of the Effect of Parameters on Predictive Power

Traditional method Multiple Independent Sampling
a. Accuracy of Implicit Solvent Methods QM/MM-GBSA > MM-GBSA > MM-PBSA QM/MM-GBSA ≈ MM-GBSA > MM-PBSA
MM-GBSA & QM/MM-GBSA
Traditional method Multiple Independent Sampling
b. Accuracy of GB Methods GBNeck2 > GBHTC >= GBOBC = GBOBC2 > GBNeck Differences are minimized
MM-PBSA
Traditional method Multiple Independent Sampling
c. Accuracy of Radii Settings bondi = mbondi2 ≈ mbondi > PARSE Differences are minimized
MM-GBSA & QM/MM-GBSA
GB Method Names AMBER igb flag Traditional method Multiple Independent Sampling
GBHCT 1 bondi = mbondi2 ≈ mbondia Differences are minimized
GBOBC 2 bondia = mbondi2a ≈ mbondi Differences are minimized
GBOBC2 5 bondia = mbondi2a >≈b mbondi Differences are minimized
GBNeck 7 mbondi2a,c ≈ bondi Differences are minimized
GBNeck2 8 mbondi2a,d ≈ bondi Differences are minimized
QM/MM-GBSA
d. Accuracy of PM Hamiltonians PM3 > AM1 > PM6
a

AMBER user manual recommended radii sets for the GB methods.

b

In MM-GBSA and GBOBC2: bondia = mbondi2a > mbondi. In QM/MM-GBSA and GBOBC2: bondia = mbondi2a ≈ mbondi

c

bondi might also work, but it might cause instability in the native peptide REMD type of simulation.

d

mbondi3 is recommended in the MD/REMD type of simulation.