Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Oct 19;26(1):28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.10.004

Table 4.

Results of the multivariable Cox regression models comparing overall survival outcomes between Asian American women and white women with cervical cancer across age strata.

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)

Characteristics Younger than 35 years,
n = 1,618
35–44 years,
n = 2,697
45–54 years,
n = 2,472
55–64 years,
n = 1,599
65 years or older,
n = 2,088
Marital status
  Single Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  Married/domestic partner 0.94 (0.69–1.28) 0.73 (0.60–0.89) 0.80 (0.67–0.96) 1.06 (0.85–1.31) 0.98 (0.79–1.21)
  Divorced/separated/widowed 1.29 (0.82–2.03) 0.74 (0.57–0.96) 1.08 (0.89–1.31) 1.07 (0.85–1.33) 1.36 (1.11–1.66)
Stage at diagnosis
  Localized Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  Regional 2.46 (1.57–3.86) 2.40 (1.84–3.15) 2.08 (1.68–2.58) 1.88 (1.49–2.38) 1.65 (1.43–1.90)
  Distant 8.68 (5.33–14.12) 8.52 (6.35–11.41) 7.95 (6.28–10.06) 5.45 (4.20–7.08) 3.60 (3.04–4.26)
Histologic classification
  Squamous cell carcinoma Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  Adenoma or adenocarcinoma 0.95 (0.65–1.39) 0.90 (0.70–1.16) 1.01 (0.83–1.21) 0.98 (0.80–1.21) 1.28 (1.12–1.46)
  Other 1.41 (0.99–2.01) 1.53 (1.22–1.92) 1.77 (1.46–2.14) 1.51 (1.23–1.85) 1.44 (1.23–1.68)
Treatment
  No surgery Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  Surgery 0.15 (0.08–0.29) 0.13 (0.08–0.20) 0.09 (0.07–0.13) 0.14 (0.10–0.19) 0.15 (0.12–0.18)
  Radiation 1.19 (0.63–2.56) 0.75 (0.49–1.13) 0.33 (0.25–0.44) 0.41 (0.32–0.52) 0.36 (0.31–0.43)
  Surgery and radiation 0.60 (0.32–1.12) 0.34 (0.23–0.52) 0.16 (0.12–0.21) 0.22 (0.17–0.28) 0.18 (0.15–0.22)
Socioeconomic status1
  Quartile 1 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  Quartile 2 0.99 (0.67–1.47) 1.00 (0.78–1.26) 0.88 (0.73–1.06) 0.91 (0.74–1.12) 0.99 (0.86–1.14)
  Quartile 3 0.84 (0.53–1.32) 1.06 (0.80–1.40) 0.92 (0.73–1.16) 0.92 (0.73–1.17) 0.92 (0.76–1.10)
  Quartile 4 1.00 (0.63–1.60) 0.88 (0.66–1.17) 0.78 (0.62–0.98) 0.85 (0.65–1.10) 0.87 (0.73–1.04)
Foreign-born2
  Quartile 1 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  Quartile 2 0.62 (0.39–0.97) 0.97 (0.75–1.25) 1.10 (0.90–1.35) 0.89 (0.71–1.11) 1.19 (1.02–1.39)
  Quartile 3 0.93 (0.59–1.46) 1.05 (0.80–1.36) 0.99 (0.80–1.23) 1.00 (0.80–1.26) 1.18 (1.01–1.39)
  Quartile 4 0.82 (0.49–1.38) 0.81 (0.59–1.10) 1.12 (0.88–1.43) 1.02 (0.78–1.33) 1.08 (0.90–1.31)
Residence population density
  County population ≥1,000,000 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  County population <1,000,000 0.93 (0.66–1.31) 0.99 (0.81–1.21) 0.98 (0.84–1.15) 0.96 (0.81–1.13) 1.08 (0.96–1.22)
Race
  White Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
  Asian American 2.42 (1.47–4.00) 1.21 (0.89–1.65) 0.92 (0.74–1.16) 0.61 (0.46–0.81) 0.59 (0.49–0.72)
Univariable analysis3 (Asian American compared with White) Worse
p < 0.001
Indifferent
p = 0.934
Indifferent
p = 0.281
Better
p < 0.001
Better
p < 0.001
1

Socioeconomic status (based on county-level poverty, education, income, and unemployment levels) was categorized into 1 of 4 relative quartiles within the study sample. Quartile 1 represents the lowest socioeconomic status, or most socioeconomically disadvantaged, and quartile 4 represents the highest socioeconomic status, or most socioeconomically advantaged.

2

Percentage of the population of the woman’s county of residence born outside the United States, categorized into 1 of 4 relative quartiles, from lowest to highest percentage.

3

Univariable analyses compared survival outcomes between the two racial groups without controlling for any other covariates.