Table 6.

The Effect of ART Availability on Work Time

	Hours per Day
	Total		Farm		Home		Other
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)
Panel A: Full Sample
2010 · ART proximity	5.04*** (1.89) [0.63]	5.17*** (1.80) [0.65]	2.21* (1.18) [0.28]	2.08* (1.20) [0.26]	0.98 (1.05) [0.12]	1.23 (1.10) [0.15]	1.85* (1.03) [0.23]	1.86* (1.01) [0.23]
Proportional selection δ Dependent variable mean Observations	- 7.49 5380	−2.23 7.49 5380	- 2.48 5380	0.86 2.48 5380	- 3.58 5380	−0.19 3.58 5380	- 1.44 5380	−4.14 1.44 5380
Panel B: HIV−/NCT Sample
2010 · ART proximity	5.59*** (1.77) [0.70]	5.34*** (1.62) [0.67]	2.84*** (1.07) [0.36]	2.74** (1.17) [0.34]	0.79 (1.04) [0.10]	0.89 (0.95) [0.11]	1.96** (0.93) [0.24]	1.71** (0.84) [0.21]
Proportional selection δ Dependent variable mean Observations	- 7.49 4030	1.11 7.49 4030	- 2.50 4030	1.27 2.50 4030	- 3.52 4030	−0.89 3.52 4030	- 1.46 4030	0.63 1.46 4030
Demo and economic controls	-	Yes	-	Yes	-	Yes	-	Yes

Note: Village-clustered standard errors appear in parentheses. Impacts of a change from 8 kilometers to 4 kilometers (0.125 · β̂) appear in brackets. Even columns control for Post · demographic characteristics, economic shocks, and access to social safety nets. All regressions include individual and region · time fixed effects.

^*p < 0.1,

^**p < 0.05,

^***p < 0.01.