. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2015 Oct 19;409(1):95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.10.019

Table 1.

Progeny from Wnt1Cre;Eng+/− or Pax3Cre;Eng+/− crosses with Eng^LoxP/LoxP mice.

Genotype	Positive/Total (%)
Tg(Wnt1-Cre);Eng^LoxP/+	21/63 (33.3%)
Eng ^LoxP/+	16/63 (25%)
Eng ^LoxP/−	10/63 (15.9%)
Tg(Wnt1-Cre);Eng^LoxP/−	16/63 (25.4%)
Pax3^Cre/+;Eng^LoxP/+	13/40 (32.5%)
Eng ^LoxP/+	16/40 (40%)
Eng ^LoxP/−	11/40 (27.5%)
Pax3^Cre/+;Eng^LoxP/−	*^0/40 (0%)**

Wnt1Cre;Eng+/− were crossed with Eng^LoxP/LoxP mice and 10 litters (63 mice) were analyzed.

Pax3Cre;Eng+/− were crossed with Eng^LoxP/LoxP mice and 9 litters (40 mice) were analyzed. If mice are viable, expected outcome is 25% of each of 4 genotypes.

Pax3^Cre/+;Eng^LoxP/− vs. Tg(Wnt1-Cre);Eng^LoxP/−, P=0.005.