Skip to main content
. 1999 Apr 15;5(2):152–155. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i2.152

Table 1.

Relationship between clinicopathologic features and incidence of C-erbB-2 amplification

Variable Case number C-erbB-2 amplification (%)
Surgical specimen Endoscopic specimen
Age (yr)
< 60 16 (31.3) 4 (25.0)
≥ 60 67 19 (28.4) 13 (19.4)
Sex
Male 51 15 (29.4) 10 (19.6)
Female 32 9 (28.1) 7 (21.9)
Gross appearance
Borrmann1 8 3 (37.5) 2 (25.0)
Borrmann 2 37 9 (24.3) 7 (18.9)
Borrmann 3 32 10 (31.2) 7 (21.9)
Borrmann 4 6 2 (33.3) 1 (16.7)
Depth of invasion
Early cancer 28 4 (14.3)a 2 (7.1)a
Advanced cancer 55 20 (36.4) 15 (27.3)
Differentiation
Well-mod 45 17 (37.8) 12 (26.7)
Poor 38 7 (18.4) 5 (13.2)
Lymph node metastasis
Positive 21 11 (52.4)b 7 (33.3)
Negative 62 13 (21.0) 10 (16.1)
Liver metastasis
Positive 13 6 (46.2) 4 (30.8)
Negative 70 18 (25.7) 13 (18.6)

Compared with the other results of same variable group,

a

P < 0.05;

b

P < 0.01. Well-mod: Well to moderately differentiated carcinoma; Poor: Poorly differentiated carcinoma.