Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;8(12):27–41.

TABLE 2.

Comparison of imaging modalities

Imaging Modality Description Benefits Risks
Radiograph A technique that uses electromagnetic radiation to create an image of the internal structures of the body
  • Low cost

  • Fast

  • Can detect phleboliths or bony remodeling

  • Ionizing radiation

  • Provides very little useful information

CT Scan A technique that uses ionizing radiation to create a multidimensional image of the body
  • Better spatial resolution compared to radiographs

  • Fast

  • Ionizing radiation

  • Provides little useful information

  • Cannot be used in children with syndromes that cause increased susceptibility to radiation

Ultrasound An imaging device that uses sound waves to visualize internal structures of the body. Doppler US uses sound waves to measure the direction and speed at which blood is flowing
  • Readily available

  • Low cost

  • Safe

  • Sedation is not needed

  • Good soft tissue contrast

  • Can determine vascularity and flow dynamics

  • Limited utility for examining deeper anatomy

  • Inferior to MRI and MRA in evaluating extent of a lesion or muscle/bone involvement

MRI An imaging technique that uses magnetic fields and radio waves to form images of internal structures in the body
  • Superior spatial resolution

  • Can determine vascularity and flow dynamics

  • No ionizing radiation

  • Can run several sequences at the same time

  • Expensive

  • Time consuming

  • May require sedation in infants and children

  • Cannot be used in the presence of implanted devices

MRA A specially tailored MR sequence that uses magnetic fields and radio waves to focus on imaging blood vessels
  • Safer than conventional angiography

  • Good spatial and temporal resolution

  • Can determine vascularity and flow dynamics

  • Expensive

  • May not be available in all centers

  • Cannot be used in patients with implanted devices

Dynamic time-resolved MRA A specific type of contrast enhanced MRA that acquires images every few seconds allowing for improved temporal resolution and evaluation of flow dynamics
  • Improved temporal resolution

  • Can determine vascularity and flow dynamics

  • Shorter procedure time and decreased contrast material used compared to traditional MRI or angiography

  • Expensive

  • May not be available in all centers

  • Cannot be used in patients with implanted devices

Angiography Technique that uses intravascular contrast injected in close proximity to the anomaly and fluoroscopy to visualize blood vessels
  • Good visualization of blood vessels

  • Invasive