Table 4. Rounding Variables Associated with Self-Reported Rounding Quality and Room for Improvement.
Regression Model | Category | Variable | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)[ a ] | P–Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Self Reported Rounding Quality | Structure | Academic Institution | 0.417 (0.148–1.172) | 0.097 |
Standard Start Time | 10.646 (2.707–41.869) | 0.001 | ||
Process | Frequent Interruptions[ b ] | 0.321 (0.121–0.853) | 0.023 | |
Outcome | Safe | 2.537 (0.972–6.619) | 0.057 | |
Timely (Not delaying patient care) | 4.806 (1.507–15.326) | 0.008 | ||
Self Reported Room for Improvement | Structure | Time Spent Per Patient (minutes)[ c ] | 1.062 (1.015–1.111) | 0.009 |
Process | Frequent Interruptions[ b ] | 2.728 (1.318–5.648) | 0.007 | |
Outcome | Safe | 0.306 (0.145–0.648) | 0.002 | |
Timely (Not delaying patient care) | 0.434 (0.180–1.048) | 0.063 |
a Odds ratio > 1 for self reported rounding quality indicates the variable is positively associated with an increased odds of reporting a higher rounding quality score on the ordinal scale. Odds ratio > 1 for self reported room for improvement indicates the variable is positively associated with an increased odds of reporting more room for improvement score on the ordinal scale.
b Reporting at least one interruption usually or always occurs during rounds
c Included as continuous variables