. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015 Sep 25;46(0 3):277–290. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.09.002

Table 3.

The Dice ratios and the corresponding standard deviations of VN, GM and WM regions before and after registration by using (1) the landmark detector only, (2) the Landmark+HAMMER approach, and (3) the original HAMMER.

Case #	Region	Before Reg.	Landmark	Landmark+HAMMER	HAMMER
Case 1	VN	57.8% (±11.9%)	81.1% (±4.03%)	86.5% (±2.38%)	80.9% (±8.93%)
	GM	47.6% (±2.47%)	53.8% (±2.22%)	66.2% (±2.17%)	65.9% (±2.29%)
	WM	57.1% (±4.02%)	65.9% (±1.70%)	76.1% (±1.65%)	75.0% (±2.53%)

Case 2	VN	54.7% (±10.5%)	78.6% (±3.36%)	85.9% (±1.51%)	76.8% (±11.1%)
	GM	45.2% (±2.06%)	50.4% (±1.87%)	66.1% (±1.58%)	65.1% (±1.85%)
	WM	60.0% (±2.65%)	67.0% (±1.39%)	79.9% (±1.28%)	77.8% (±2.09%)