Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015 Sep 25;46(0 3):277–290. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.09.002

Table 4.

The Dice ratios and the corresponding standard deviations of VN, GM and WM regions, for both the Landmark+HAMMER approach and the original HAMMER.

Region Before Reg. Landmark+HAMMER HAMMER
VN 64.7% (±9.39%) 84.1% (±2.67%) 81.9% (±5.43%)
GM 52.4% (±1.85%) 67.8% (±1.60%) 66.7% (±1.97%)
WM 61.7% (±2.62%) 76.1% (±1.39%) 74.6% (±1.85%)