Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2015 Jun 23;71(4):941–949. doi: 10.1111/biom.12338

Table 1.

Simulation results for various estimators of model parameters (regression coefficients ψ, β, γ and log hazard ratio ϕ) using profile, partial, weighted martingale equations jointly with the logistic estimation equation for ψ. True β and γ are 1 and 0, respectively. Both the true and the fitted models use covariate (Z)-dependent misattribution. The log-odds ratio of misattribution in the true model is −1.7 + 0.5Z. The sample sizes of the survival and external data sets are n = 500 and nr = 150, respectively. True log hazards ratio ϕ = 0.7 in the time-independent case (PH) and ϕ = 2T in the time-varying case (non-PH). The sample standard deviations (SSD) and average of the standard error estimates (SEE) are presented in parenthesis.

Assumed Model/Method, Estimating Equations Martingale Weights Baseline Hazard(s) Finite-dim Parameters True model used in simulations
constant ϕ time-varying ϕ
Logistic (Misattribution), External data, (20) ψ0
ψ1
−1.771 (.371,.367)
0.533 (.300,.300)
−1.776 (.371,.358)
0.531 (.333,.315)
Profile, (10)
PH, Const ϕ
PH-based
(11), (18)
Ĥ1(t), (12) ϕF
βF
γF
0.693 (.229,.229)
0.999 (.097,.093)
0.006 (.114,.114)
0.802 (.233,.228)
1.089 (.097,.094)
−0.068 (.112,.115)
Partial, (13)
PH, Const ϕ
PH-based
(11), (18)
Ĥ1(t)eϕ̂ → Ĥ2(t)
(14)
ϕP
βP
γP
0.695 (.238,.236)
1.000 (.102,.097)
0.007 (.116,.116)
0.652 (.227,.233)
1.011 (.093,.095)
−0.001 (.124,.120)
Weighted
Martingale, (9)
PH-based
(11), (18)
Ĥ1 (t), Ĥ2(t)
(15) with (11)
ϕW
βW
γW
0.692 (.236,.235)
0.999 (.101,.097)
0.007 (.115,.116)
0.636 (.220,.229)
1.001 (.091,.093)
0.002 (.123,.119)
Unweighted
Martingale, (16)
Const Ĥ1(t), Ĥ2(t)
(17)
βC
γC
1.003 (.107,.102)
0.004 (.119,.120)
1.005 (.094,.097)
−0.002 (.126,.123)