Table 3.

Models estimating the marginal proportional hazards of stopping the sustainment of A-CRA

Characteristics	Estimate	SE	Lower	Upper	Chi-square	p value
			Wald CL	Wald CL
Setting
Org. focus	−1.90	0.53	−2.93	−0.86	12.95	<0.001*
No. of services	−0.06	0.07	−0.21	0.09	0.57	0.45
Communications	0.02	0.03	−0.04	0.08	0.42	0.52
Funding stability	−0.20	0.05	−0.31	−0.09	13.64	<0.001*
Org. capacity	0.04	0.04	−0.03	0.12	1.22	0.27
Partnerships	−0.01	0.04	−0.08	0.07	0.03	0.87
Political support	−0.09	0.04	−0.16	−0.01	4.92	0.03**
Prog. adaptation	0.08	0.05	−0.03	0.18	2.13	0.14
Prog. evaluation	0.05	0.05	−0.04	0.14	1.06	0.30
Strategic planning	−0.01	0.03	−0.08	0.06	0.06	0.81
Implementation
No. of clinicians	−0.88	0.24	−1.36	−0.41	13.16	<0.001*
No. of supervisors	−0.32	0.32	−0.94	0.31	1.00	0.32
No. of youth	−0.01	0.01	−0.02	−0.01	4.93	<0.03**
Intervention
Complexity	0.41	0.11	0.20	0.62	14.27	<0.001*
Imp. difficulty	0.21	0.09	0.04	0.38	5.60	0.02**
Perc. success	−0.03	0.08	−0.18	0.12	0.18	0.67
Rel. advantage	−0.13	0.08	−0.29	0.03	2.48	0.11

SE standard errors, CL confidence levels

*Statistical significance at false discovery rate of 0.05

**False discover rate of 0.10