Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 23;12:20. doi: 10.1186/s12982-015-0041-8

Table 1.

Cost comparison of conventional versus actual sampling strategy in Gansu

Assumptions Scenarios
Conventional household listing
Actual
satellite-aided household listing
Optimistic
(easy access)
Realistic
(medium access)
Conservative
(difficult access)
Number of sites for listing 16 16 16 16
Number of team days per site 0.5 0.75 1 0
Number of required overnight stays 4 6 8 0
Household listing costs in planned design Optimistic Realistic Conservative Actual
Item Unit Costs/unit Total costs Total costs Total costs Total costs
Field investigator (×6) Daily rate p.p. £18.42 £884.21 £1326.32 £1768.42
Supervisor (×2) Daily rate p.p. £23.68 £378.95 £568.42 £757.89
Vehicle (incl. driver, fuel) Daily rate £76.84 £614.74 £922.11 £1229.47
Insurance (×8) Daily rate p.p. £0.17 £11.02 £16.53 £22.05
Team accommodation (×9) Night p.p. £15.79 £568.42 £852.63 £1136.84
Overseas travel allowance Daily rate £50.00 £400.00 £600.00 £800.00
Smartphone Unit £100.00 £100.00
Printing Total charges £40.00 £40.00
Mobile data charges Total charges £30.00 £30.00
Labour costs for satellite sampling Hourly rate £15.00 (£960.00)
Touchscreen laptop Unit £700.00 (£700.00)
GPS units Unit £18.00 (£180.00)
Total £2857.34 £4286.01 £5714.68 £170–2010

Source: own elaboration

Data based on actual expenditures. Assumed exchange rate: GBP 1.00 = CNY 9.50. Expenditures in parentheses are likely to arise in other research but did not accrue in the present study