Table 1. Results for statistical models examining effect of experimental treatment on and male sexual attractiveness on calling effort.
Response | Predictor | β | SE | Z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Calling (N = 56) | Intercept | −1.911 | 0.652 | −2.931 | 0.003 |
Attractiveness (Un) | −1.855 | 0.984 | −1.886 | 0.059 | |
Immune status (Sa) | −2.056 | 1.012 | −2.033 | 0.042 | |
Time | 0.004 | 0.001 | 3.205 | 0.001 | |
Immune status (Sa): Attractiveness (Un) | 3.224 | 1.425 | 2.263 | 0.024 | |
Immune status (Sa): Time | 0.003 | 0.002 | 1.516 | 0.130 | |
Attractiveness (Un): Time | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.374 | 0.170 | |
Immune status (Sa): Attractiveness (Un): Time | −0.004 | 0.003 | −1.419 | 0.156 | |
(B) Attractive males (N = 28) | Intercept | −1.773 | 0.563 | −3.15 | 0.001 |
Immune status (Sa) | −1.942 | 0.881 | −2.204 | 0.027 | |
Time | 0.003 | 0.001 | 3.205 | 0.001 | |
Immune status (Sa): Time | 0.003 | 0.002 | 1.516 | 0.129 | |
(C) Unattractive males (N = 28) | Intercept | −4.074 | 0.952 | −4.278 | 1.88 × 10−05 |
Immune status (Sa) | 1.298 | 1.152 | 1.127 | 0.260 | |
Time | 0.005 | 0.001 | 4.392 | 1.12 × 10−05 | |
Immune status (Sa): Time | −0.000 | 0.001 | −0.378 | 0.705 |