Table 4.
Item a | Total bacteria | Lactobacillus | Escherichia | C. perfringens |
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | ||||
Basal diet, unchallenged | 9.00 | 7.89 | 8.00 | 2.27 |
60 mg/kg EO, unchallenged | 9.28 | 7.98 | 7.60 | 2.35 |
120 mg/kg EO, unchallenged | 9.35 | 8.30 | 7.55 | 2.34 |
240 mg/kg EO, unchallenged | 9.22 | 8.14 | 7.15 | 2.34 |
Basal diet, challenged | 9.41 | 8.11 | 8.72 | 2.50 |
60 mg/kg EO, challenged | 9.48 | 8.38 | 8.99 | 2.39 |
120 mg/kg EO, challenged | 9.44 | 8.39 | 8.26 | 2.43 |
240 mg/kg EO, challenged | 9.29 | 8.27 | 8.03 | 2.57 |
SEM | 0.068 | 0.073 | 0.137 | 0.033 |
P-value | ||||
Challenge | 0.185 | 0.169 | <0.001 | 0.030 |
EO | 0.735 | 0.438 | 0.095 | 0.805 |
Challenge × EO | 0.828 | 0.888 | 0.713 | 0.655 |
Linear b | 0.945 | 0.366 | 0.027 | 0.553 |
Quadratic b | 0.261 | 0.172 | 0.853 | 0.707 |
a Values are means of eight replicates per treatment, and expressed as log10 (copy/g digesta). EO, essential oils; unchallenged, birds without challenge of C. perfringens; challenged, birds challenged with C. perfringens from day 14 to 20; SEM, pooled standard error of the mean; Challenge × EO, interaction between C. perfringens challenge and EO supplementation
b When interaction between C. perfringens challenge and EO supplementation was not significant, linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts were performed on the main-effect means to EO dosages