Table 2.
QTL analysis for dwarf vine in C. maxima
| Trait | QTL | LG. | Position (cM) | Left Marker | Right Marker | Physical length (Mb) | LOD score | PVE (R2 %) | Add | Dom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VL | qCmB1 | 1 | 142.0 | S7_4699613 | S7_4938419 | 0.24 | 6.07 | 9.95 | 30.33 | −4.41 |
| qCmB2 | 3 | 125.0 | S5_1064936 | S5_649585 | 0.42 | 12.24 | 21.39 | 44.40 | −1.80 | |
| qCmB3 | 4 | 2.0 | S2_296713 | S2_1046501 | 0.75 | 4.60 | 7.65 | 26.67 | −3.81 |
VL vine length, PVE percentage of the phenotypic variation explained by the QTL; Add, positive values of the additive effect indicated that alleles from SQ026 were in the direction of increasing trait score; Dom dominant effects