Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2015 Apr 17;17(9):2190–2193. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00828

Table 1.

Reaction condition optimization.a

graphic file with name nihms-743910-t0002.jpg

entry Cu cat. solvent temp (°C) yield (%)a

1 CuI THF 80 85b
2 CuI THF 80 88
3 CuI toluene 80 75
4 CuI DCE 80 65
5 CuI 1,4-dioxane 80 82
6 CuI MeCN 80 90
7 - MeCN 80 0
8 CuI MeCN rt 39
9 CuI MeCN 50 93
10 CuCl MeCN 50 88
11 CuBr MeCN 50 98
12 CuBr MeCN 50 93b
13 CuBr MeCN 50 80c
14 CuBr MeCN 50 traced
a

General reaction conditions: A solution of 1a (0.15 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol), and Cu(I) catalyst (0.1 equiv) were stirred until no more starting material left. The reaction process was monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Isolated yield from flash chromatography was given;

b

1/1 of 1a/2a (0.1 mmol);

c

1a (0.1 mmol) and 2a (0.15 mmol);

d

Phenanthroline (0.1 equiv).