Skip to main content
. 2004 Spring;8(2):12–18. doi: 10.7812/tpp/04.969

Table 2.

Quality measures used in Initiative to Improve Mammogram Interpretation

Quality measure Goal Benchmark
Proportion of cancers detected at stage 0 or 1 80% in 1998
85% by 2003
80%1
Sensitivity 80% 73%1
Cancers diagnosed per 1000 mammograms >6 62
Diagnosis of new, probably benign lesion 7% in 1998
4% by 2003
5%3
Recall rate for screening mammograms ≤7%a 8.3%1
Positive predictive value 25–40%a 23–5346
Annual number of mammograms read per radiologist >4000 4807
36008
Cost per mammogram per relative value unit ≤ Medicare rate Medicare b
120–160% c
Radiologist satisfaction >90% 89.25%d
a

Measures of individual variation are applied. Generally, interventions are conducted when variation exceeds 2 SD.

b

The 2003 Medicare reimbursement rate, applying the KP Colorado geographic practice cost index (GCPI), is $36.42.

c

Prevailing community commercial reimbursement rate, per KP Colorado External Medical Services Department.

d

As an average of the four indicators of overall physician satisfaction assessed in the Colorado Permanente Medical Group physician satisfaction survey.