Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 24;161:56–64.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.027

Table 3.

Comparison of the top performing corneal response variables and geometric measurements for distinguishing Marfan syndrome eyes from controls.

Group Variable AUROC P value Confidence
Interval
Cutoff Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV NPV
1: Applanation Signal Intensity Concavity Min 0.80 0.008 (0.65, 0.95) 51.01 54 96 88 79
Concavity Mean 0.79 0.02 (0.63, 0.95) 163.33 85 67 58 89
2: Pressure CRF (mmHg) 0.74 0.02 (0.57, 0.92) 10.30 85 63 53 88
CH (mmHg) 0.77 0.01 (0.60, 0.94) 10.90 77 71 59 85
P1 (mmHg) 0.76 0.01 (0.60, 0.93) 51.80 85 67 58 89
P2 (mmHg) 0.75 0.01 (0.58, 0.92) 41.01 85 63 55 88
P1P2Avg (mmHg) 0.76 0.01 (0.59, 0.92) 46.35 85 67 58 89
5: Pressure and Applanation Intensity HLA 0.72 0.03 (0.54, 0.89) 26213.8 4 54 88 70 78
Geometric measurements Corneal Curvature (Km, diopter) 0.72 0.04 (0.54, 0.90) 41.40 D 62 79 62 79

Abbreviations: CH = corneal hysteresis; CRF = corneal resistance factor; HLA = hysteresis loop area; AUROC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value