Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2015 Oct 14;75:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.10.003

Table 3.

Challenging Behaviors and Study Outcomes

Independent Variables M (SD), % or Median n
Factor 1: Interpersonal negativity 0.18 (.25) 63
Factor 2: Avoidant/disengaged 0.50 (.29) 63
Factor 3: Behavioral dysregulation 0.08 (.20) 63
Frequency of out of session coaching 12.00 59a
Therapist’s out of session limits observed 79.70% 59b
Dependent Variables
Treatment Dropout 57.10% 63
Frequency of Self-Directed Violence 10.98 (33.29) 54c
Severity of Most Severe Self-Directed Violence 2.75 (1.48)d 58e
Deficits in Emotion Regulation (DERS) Change Score from Baseline to Follow-up 34.93 (36.44) 44f
Client Satisfaction (CSQ) Score 27.08 (5.41) 50g
Therapist Satisfaction 2.58 (1.12) 63
Global Severity Index Change 0.8 (1.1) 46h
a

4 clients’ out of session coaching calls are missing because the therapist could not remember.

b

4 clients’ out of session limits are missing because the therapist could not remember.

c

2 clients’ data were not possible to determine based on their report, 7 clients refused to complete at least one interview during the follow-up period.

d

Severity rated by interview between 1 “very low” severity and 6 “severe”; M (SD) calculated on clients (N=24) that made a self-directed violence.

e

1 client’s data was not possible to determine based on their report, 4 clients refused to complete at least one interview during the follow-up period.

f

19 clients did not complete the DERS at the follow-up point (generally due to completing abbreviated interview), so a DERS change score was not able to be calculated.

g

11 clients did not complete the CSQ during the follow-up period, 2 clients’ data were incomplete and could not be scored.

h

17 clients did not complete the BSI at the follow-up point (generally due to completing abbreviated interview), so a GSI change score was not able to be calculated.