Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0144869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144869

Table 2. Comparison of model outcomes for STI prevalence and infections averted using point estimates to those from a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis.

Point Estimate Sensitivity analysis median (2.5,97.5 percentile)
No intervention Condoms Condoms + screen No intervention Condoms Condoms + screen
Prevalence
HIV 0.21% 0.20% 0.20% 0.19% (0.01–4.79) 0.19% (0.07–0.40) 0.19% (0.07–0.40)
Hepatitis B 1.26% 1.18% 0.63% 1.16% (0.34–2.68) 1.07% (0.31–2.51) 0.59% (0.17–1.46)
Syphilis* 0.31% 0.06% 0.01% 0.27% (0.01–2.04) 0.06% (0.01–0.18) 0.01% (0.00–0.19)
Chlamydia 6.8% 4.8% 4.1% 9.0% (6.8–11.0) 7.2% (4.2–9.5) 4.4% (2.3–6.1)
Gonorrhoea* 0.30% 0.07% 0.02% 0.30% (0.04–1.60) 0.07% (0.03–0.14) 0.02% (0.01–0.10)
Infections averted per year
HIV 0.2 0.2 0.17 (0.01–4.79) 0.17 (0.01–4.79)
Hepatitis B 5 6 5 (1–16) 6 (1–19)
Syphilis* 66 67 54 (0–479) 55 (0–466)
Chlamydia 196 222 172 (62–489) 193 (0–523)
Gonorrhoea* 113 114 108 (1–677) 109 (1–681)

*Due to the large right skew of infections prevented and prevalence, the 0–95 percentiles have been used as the 95%CrI.