Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan;17(1):109–114. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00446-5

Table 2.

Results of secondary analyses of association of DCIS detection frequencies with subsequent invasive interval cancer incidence

Poisson regression coefficient (95% CI) p value
Adjustment for small (<15 mm) invasive tumours
Frequency of screen-detected DCIS −0·080 (−0·13 to −0·03) 0·003
Small screen-detected tumours −0·0003 (−0·001 to 0·0004) 0·38
Adjustment for screen-detected grade 3 invasive tumours
Frequency of screen-detected DCIS −0·089 (−0·14 to −0·03) 0·001
Grade 3 screen-detected tumours 0·0003 (−0·0003 to 0·001) 0·35
Restriction to invasive interval cancers diagnosed within 24 months
Frequency of screen-detected DCIS −0·089 (−0·16 to −0·016) 0·016
Repeat of primary analysis to include the 2003–04 data from Scotland
Frequency of screen-detected DCIS −0·086 (−0·14 to −0·033) 0·001

DCIS=ductal carcinoma in situ.