Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Nov 6;125:767–779. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.005

Table 1.

Statistics of the distance between the anterior tip of the Meyer’s loop and anatomical landmarks: the temporal and occipital pole. For our results, we listed the measurements from each hemisphere separately. Results from post-mortem dissection (Ebeling & Ruelen, 1988) and a DTI-based ConTrack method (Sherbondy et al., 2008) were listed for comparisons, where the measurements from both hemispheres were pooled together to obtain the statistics. d1 and d2 denote the absolute difference of the y-coordinate from the anterior tip of Meyer’s loop to the temporal pole and occipital pole, respectively. All measurements are in mm.

Measurement Our Res: LH Our Res: RH Dissection
(Ebeling & Ruelen, 1988)		 ConTrack
(Sherbondy et al., 2008)
d1 30.7±4.0 30.9±4.0 27±3.5 28±3.0
d1 range (19.7, 43.4) (21.4, 42.0) (22, 37) (24, 34)
d2 95.4±5.2 95.0±5.4 98±6.2 96±5.5
d2 range (82.3, 109.7) (78.3, 109.1) (85, 108) (89, 108)