Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;25(12):990–998. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0390

Table 2.

Results of Meta-analysis Comparison of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy

    Number of patients     Study heterogeneity  
Outcomes of interest Number of studies LRH ARH WMD/OR (95% CI) P valuea χ2 df I2(%) P valuea
Primary outcomes
 5-year DFSb 10 791 1031 0.01 (−0.10, 0.11) .91 4.78 9 0 .85
 5-year OSb 6 656 847 −0.02 (−0.14, 0.10) .73 4.28 5 0 .51
 Recurrence rateb 13 924 1350 0.82 (0.61, 1.11) .20 3.37 12 0 .99
Secondary outcomes
 Intraoperative bowel-urinary injury 17 1083 1282 1.50 (0.99, 2.26) .06 6.79 16 0 .98
 Perioperative complication 4 315 555 0.56 (0.36, 0.90) .02 2.50 3 0 .47
 Postoperative complication 18 1078 1451 0.75 (0.62, 0.91) .003 40.31 16 60 .0007
 Intraoperative complication 10 523 661 1.48 (0.75, 2.91) .25 8.31 9 0 .50
 Bladder recovery (days) 3 61 119 −2.48 (−5.16, 0.19) .07 17.46 2 89 .0002
 Anorectal recovery (days) 4 104 123 −0.80 (−1.16, −0.44) <.00001 4.65 2 57 .1
 Pelvic LNs removed 16 813 1220 −1.44 (−4.14, 1.27) .3 247.44 15 94 <.00001
 Para-aortic LNs removed 2 73 78 −1.79 (−6.39, 2.82) .45 18.41 1 95 <.0001
 Operation time (minutes) 17 841 1383 18.76 (2.13, 35.39) .03 184.15 16 91 <.00001
 Length of stay (days) 16 1054 1437 −4.36 (−5.38, −3.34) <.00001 141.26 15 89 <.00001
 Blood loss (mL) 17 1089 1481 −193.61 (−236.80, −150.43) <.00001 80.44 16 80 <.00001
a

Statistically significant results are shown in bold.

b

Prognostic factors were not significantly different.

ARH, abdominal radical hysterectomy; CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; DFS, disease-free survival; LN, lymph node; LRH, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; OS, overall survival; WMD/OR, weighted mean difference/odds ratio.