. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2015 Aug 28;296:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.08.028

Table 4.

Mediation between M268T and cognitionby the SLF and cingulum CG

Mediator	Direct Effect	Indirect Effect	Total Effect	% Mediated
RBANS coding ^a
FA SLF	−7.692^*	0.587	−7.105^*	−0.083
Length SLF	−8.544^*	1.439	−7.105^*	−0.203
FA cingulum CG	−3.712	−3.244	−6.956^*	0.466
MD cingulum CG	−5.387	−1.568	−6.956^*	0.225
Length cingulum CG	−3.906	−3.050	−6.956^*	0.439

RBANS semantic fluency ^a
FA SLF	−4.528^*	−0.859	−5.387^*	0.160
Length SLF	−4.862^*	−0.525	−5.387^*	0.097
FA cingulum CG	−4.400^*	−0.892	−5.292^*	0.169
MD cingulum CG	−4.589^*	−0.703	−5.292^*	0.133
Length cingulum CG	−4.354^*	−0.938	−5.292^*	0.177

Word generation animals ^a
FA SLF	−4.476	−0.300	−4.777^*	0.063
Length SLF	−4.653	−0.124	−4.777^*	0.026
FA cingulum CG	−4.067	−0.706	−4.773^*	0.148
MD cingulum CG	−4.386	−0.387	−4.773^*	0.081
Length cingulum CG	−3.999	−0.774	−4.773^*	0.162

Note: All regions of interest are from the left hemisphere.

Number Correct,

Statistically Significant p< .05