Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chem. 2014 Jul 1;60(9):1225–1233. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.222778

Table 2.

HF and mortality according to baseline high-sensitivity cTnI.a

Outcome HR per 1SD increment in log high-sensitivity cTnI values (95% CI) P HR for high-sensitivity cTnI values >80th percentile (95% CI) P
HF
 Unadjusted 1.91 (1.70–2.15) <0.0001 4.59 (3.48–6.07) <0.0001
 Age and sex 1.70 (1.47–1.96) <0.0001 3.02 (2.25–4.06) <0.0001
 Model 1 1.62 (1.38–1.90) <0.0001 2.56 (1.88–3.50) <0.0001
 Model 2 1.33 (1.04–1.69) 0.023 1.43 (0.92–2.28) 0.114
 Model 3 1.42 (1.20–1.68) <0.0001 2.04 (1.46–2.83) <0.0001
Mortality
 Unadjusted 1.79 (1.64–1.96) <0.0001 4.17 (3.35–5.19) <0.0001
 Age and sex 1.43 (1.26–1.62) <0.0001 2.12 (1.67–2.68) <0.0001
 Model 1 1.36 (1.18–1.56) <0.0001 1.91 (1.49–2.46) <0.0001
 Model 2 1.12 (0.90–1.39) 0.330 1.53 (1.07–2.17) 0.019
 Model 3 1.15 (0.98–1.33) 0.075 1.41 (1.08–1.85) 0.012
a

Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, creatinine (log), BMI, smoking status, and presence of hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. Model 2 was adjusted for all variables in Model 1 plus ejection fraction <50%, moderate/severe diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial enlargement, and presence of wall motion abnormalities. Model 3 was adjusted for all variables in Model 1 plus NT-proBNP.