Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016 Jan;36(1):2–3. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306796

Human Macrophage Genetic Engineering

Jonathan D Smith 1
PMCID: PMC4692174  NIHMSID: NIHMS738933  PMID: 26700133

Macrophages, in addition to their role in innate immunity, play a central role in atherosclerosis as the precursors to foam cells in arterial lesions1. Macrophages express a variety of scavenger receptors that take up modified apoB-containing lipoproteins in a manner that is not subject to the negative feedback regulation observed for the LDL receptor, thus leading to the accumulation of excess cholesterol that is esterified and stored in lipid droplets. Macrophages also express ABCA1 and ABCG1, and thus can efflux free cholesterol to apoA-I and HDL, respectively, in the first step of the reverse cholesterol transport pathway. Macrophages are widely studied in regard to atherosclerosis, modified lipoprotein uptake, and cholesterol efflux/reverse cholesterol transport, as well as to gain insight into pathways and mechanisms that might be leveraged for potential therapeutic strategies. Up until now, most of what we know about macrophage biology is from the study of murine macrophages. It is relatively simple to retrieve elicited peritoneal macrophages or culture bone-marrow derived macrophages from wild type, transgenic over expressing, or gene knockout mice. Thus, in vitro macrophage studies can be performed on cultured cells taking advantage of numerous available gene targeted mouse models. In addition, mouse bone marrow transplantation studies are often performed in order to distinguish the effects of gene targeting in hematopoietic-derived donor cells vs. host somatic tissue. There is one commonly used human monocytic cell line, THP-1, which can be differentiated into macrophage-like cells in culture, but the undifferentiated monocytic cells grow in suspension and are not easily selected clonally after genetic engineering. One can prepare primary human peripheral blood monocytes by density gradient centrifugation, which upon culturing for several days acquire a macrophage-like phenotype; however, it would be tedious to perform genetic engineering on these non-dividing primary cells.

In this issue of ATVB, Gupta et al. report a streamlined protocol to study genetically engineered human macrophages2. This protocol combines two existing methods along with the use of pluripotent human embryonic stem cells (hESC). The test gene in this case was ABCA1, which is essential in the formation of HDL and mutated in Tangier disease patients3. The ABCA1 gene was disrupted in its coding region using CRISPR/Cas9 mediated targeted double strand breaks, which are repaired via non-homologous end joining to induce small insertion/deletion (indel) frameshift mutations. The HUES9 cell line was transiently transfected with plasmids encoding a CRISPR-GFP fusion protein along with one transcribing an ABCA1 targeting guide RNA. The efficiency of this protocol relied on flow cytometry to select only the GFP-expressing cells. Of the 192 clonally derived cell lines screened, 76% had one or both ABCA1 genes edited. These authors followed up with two cell lines each of unedited cells and those with bi-allelic frame shift mutations. The second stage of this protocol was the differentiation of these hESCs into CD14+ monocytes and then macrophages, adapting published methods4, 5. Western blots and cholesterol efflux to apoA-I were performed to assess ABCA1 protein expression and activity. Although both were markedly reduced in the bi-allelic edited cell lines, residual ABCA1 expression and activity were present, indicating that the cell lines were possibly contaminated with non-edited cells.

Another way to study genetic effects in human macrophages would be via making patient specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Although, this first requires identifying and characterizing potentially rare mutations, there are several examples of these studies57. The methods described by Gupta et al. could also be applied to mouse embryonic stem cells, thus allowing researchers to make gene knockouts in mouse macrophages for which no mouse model exists. By adding a donor ssDNA to CAS9 and guide RNA transfections, one could select for homologous repair events, allowing one to make allele replacements to study not only protein coding changes, but also regulatory variants that might alter mRNA transcription, translation, or stability in human or murine macrophages. There is a great need for these types of studies, as genome wide association studies as well as functional genomic screens linking gene expression to genetic variation find many potential non-coding, putative regulatory variants that are in strong linkage disequilibrium with each other, and thus identification of the true causal regulatory variant requires functional testing810. Thus, it is likely that similar methodology as described by Gupta et al. will become widely adapted for functional genomic validation using gene edited stem cells induced to differentiate into a variety of tissue types.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by an National Institutes of Health grant P01 HL029582.

Footnotes

Disclosures

None.

References

  • 1.Mallat Z. Macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:2509–2519. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gupta RM, Meisner TB, Cowan CA, Musunuru K. Genome-edited human pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages as a model of reverse choleterol transport. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang S, Smith JD. Abca1 and nascent hdl biogenesis. BioFactors. 2014;40:547–554. doi: 10.1002/biof.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karlsson KR, Cowley S, Martinez FO, Shaw M, Minger SL, James W. Homogeneous monocytes and macrophages from human embryonic stem cells following coculture-free differentiation in m-csf and il-3. Experimental hematology. 2008;36:1167–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Panicker LM, Miller D, Park TS, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell model recapitulates pathologic hallmarks of gaucher disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:18054–18059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207889109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang H, Xue C, Shah R, et al. Functional analysis and transcriptomic profiling of ipsc-derived macrophages and their application in modeling mendelian disease. Circ Res. 2015;117:17–28. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tanaka T, Takahashi K, Yamane M, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells from cinca syndrome patients as a model for dissecting somatic mosaicism and drug discovery. Blood. 2012;120:1299–1308. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-417881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hsu J, Smith JD. Genetic-genomic replication to identify candidate mouse atherosclerosis modifier genes. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2013;2:e005421. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.005421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Erbilgin A, Civelek M, Romanoski CE, Pan C, Hagopian R, Berliner JA, Lusis AJ. Identification of cad candidate genes in gwas loci and their expression in vascular cells. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:1894–1905. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M037085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Braenne I, Civelek M, Vilne B, et al. Prediction of causal candidate genes in coronary artery disease loci. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:2207–2217. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES