Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;12:E226. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150398

Table 3. Sociodemographic, Lifestyle, and Health Characteristics of Participants (N = 666) in Study on Cancer Worry Among Adults Aged 50 or Older, by Tertiles of Cancer Worry Scale (CWS)a Scores, Spain, 2012–2014b .

Characteristic CWS Score
P Value for Linear Trend
1st tertile (≤7 Points), n (%) 2nd Tertile (8–10 Points), n (%) 3rd Tertile (>10 Points), n (%)
Age, y
50– 64 153 (65.4) 162 (70.4) 150 (74.3) .04
≥65 81 (34.6) 68 (29.6) 52 (25.7)
Rural or urban setting
Rural 49 (20.9) 63 (27.4) 71 (35.1) .001
Urban 185 (79.1) 167 (72.6) 131 (64.9)
Educational level
No formal education or primary only 161 (68.8) 141 (61.3) 147 (72.8) .44
Secondary or university 73 (31.2) 89 (38.79 55 (27.2)
Marital status
Single, divorced, or widowed 51 (21.8) 50 (21.7) 33 (16.3) .17
Married or stable union 183 (78.2) 180 (78.3) 169 (83.7)
Form of cohabitation
Living alone 23 (9.8) 22 (9.6) 12 (6.0) .17
Living with spouse or other form of cohabitation 211 (90.2) 208 (90.4) 187 (94.0)
Social classc
Classes I–IV 63 (26.9) 74 (32.2) 53 (26.2) .93
Classes V–VII 171 (73.1) 156 (67.8) 149 (73.8)
Level of physical activityd
High or moderate 135 (57.7) 155 (67.4) 139 (68.8) .01
Low or inactive 99 (42.3) 75 (32.6) 63 (31.2)
Smoking habit
Yes 42 (17.9) 46 (20.0) 44 (21.8) .32
No 192 (82.1) 184 (80.0) 158 (78.2)
Alcohol consumption (hazardous drinker)e
Yes 8 (3.4) 8 (3.5) 6 (3.0) .80
No 226 (96.6) 222 (96.5) 202 (97.0)
Balanced dietf
Yes 89 (38.0) 88 (38.3) 71 (35.7) .62
No 145 (62.0) 142 (61.7) 128 (64.3)
Personal history of cancer
Yes 14 (6.0) 18 (7.8) 26 (12.9) .01
No 220 (94.0) 212 (92.2) 176 (87.1)
Family history of cancer
Yes 102 (43.6) 108 (47.0) 112 (55.4) .015
No 132 (56.4) 122 (53.0) 90 (44.6)
Number of health problems
<3 183 (78.2) 168 (73.0) 126 (62.4) <.001
≥3 51 (21.8) 62 (27.0) 76 (37.6)
Charlson Comorbidity Indexg
0–2 points 175 (74.8) 190 (82.6) 147 (72.8) .70
≥3 points 59 (25.2) 40 (17.4) 55 (27.2)
Self-perceived health
Very poor, poor, or fair 42 (17.9) 44 (19.1) 84 (41.6) <.001
Good or very good 192 (82.1) 186 (80.9) 118 (58.4)
Functional limitationh
Yes 51 (21.8) 43 (18.7) 58 (28.7) .10
No 183 (78.2) 187 (81.3) 144 (71.3)
Locus of controli
Internal 160 (68.7) 162 (70.4) 115 (58.7) .04
Other 73 (31.3) 68 (29.6) 81 (41.3)
Social supportj
Weak 8 (3.5) 7 (3.1) 16 (8.1) .03
Normal 223 (96.5) 221 (96.9) 182 (91.9)
a

Level of cancer worry was measured by the Spanish version of the CWS (2), made up of 6 questions with 4 response options (1 = not at all or rarely; 2 = sometimes; 3 = often; 4 = almost all the time), such that each individual attains a score ranging from 6 (minimum worry) to 24 (maximum worry).

b

Through simple random sampling, participants residing in 8 basic health areas in the Province of Albacete in southwest Spain were selected on the basis of health card data, which reflect all people entitled to health care under Spain’s National Health System.

c

Classes I and II = , higher-grade and lower-grade professionals, administrators and officials, managers, professions linked to university degrees; Classes III and IV = middle management and managerial staff, self-employed persons; Class V = , lower-grade skilled technicians; Classes VI and VII = semi-skilled and unskilled workers.

d

Measured by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (12).

e

Defined as consuming 280 g of alcohol per week (men) and 168 g per week (women).

f

Assessed by a food frequency questionnaire (Cuestionario de Frecuencia de Consumo de Alimentos) (13) in accordance with guidelines of the Spanish Society of Community Nutrition (Sociedad Española de Nutrición Comunitaria).

g

Charlson et al (14).

h

Assessed with the EuroQol-5D questionnaire (15), which includes items on mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression.

i

Locus of control refers to the extent to which people believe outcomes are determined by what they do (internal control) or are determined by events outside their control (external control); assessed using the 9-item Font scale (16).

j

Assessed by the 11-item Duke–UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire (17).