Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 15;77(Suppl 2):480–483. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-0882-8

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate, PPV, and NPV of touch imprint, crush preparation, and FNA methods compared with permanent pathology

Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV False positive False negative
(%) CI (%) (%) (%) CI (%) CI
Touch imprint 80 72.2–87.8 100 100 96.7 93.1–99.2 0 20 12.2–27.8
Crush preparation 80 72.2–87.8 100 100 96.7 93.1–99.2 0 20 12.7–27
FNA 62.5 53.6–71.2 100 100 95.3 91.1–99.4 0 37.5 28.1–46.9

PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, FNA fine-needle aspiration, CI confidence interval