1. Research question
|
/ |
|
|
Did the paper address a clear research question?
|
|
|
|
2. Design
|
/ |
|
|
Was the study design appropriate to the research question? In particular, was a qualitative approach suitable and was the right design used?
|
|
|
|
3. Context
|
|
/ |
|
Was the context of the study sufficiently well described that the findings can be related to other settings?
|
|
|
|
4. Sampling
|
|
|
/ |
Did the researchers include sufficient cases/settings/observations so that conceptual rather than statistical generalizations could be made?
|
|
|
|
Were the authors' preconceptions and ideology adequately set aside?
|
5. Data collection
|
/ |
|
|
Was the data collection process systematic, thorough and auditable? Were attempts made to identify and explore disconfirming examples?
|
|
|
|
6. Data analysis
|
/ |
|
|
Were data analyzed systematically and rigorously? Did the analysis take account of all observations? Were sufficient data presented? Were disconfirming observations dealt with?
|
7. Results
|
|
|
/ |
Were there any unintended consequences? |
|
|
|
8. Conclusions
|
|
|
/ |
Did the authors draw a clear link between data and explanation (theory)?
|
9. Reflexivity
|
/ |
|
|
Were the authors' positions and roles clearly explained and the resulting biases considered?
|
|
|
|
10. Ethics
|
|
/ |
|
Are there any ethical reservations about the study?
|
11. Worth/relevance
|
/ |
|
|
Was this piece of work worth doing at all, and has it contributed usefully to knowledge?
|
|
|
|