Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 26;80(6):1315–1323. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12755

Table 3.

Contraceptive use in 2013 in women aged 16–45 years – comparing the general population (not on any AED) with those on enzyme inducing, non‐enzyme inducing or both types of AED

General GMS population % Enzyme inducing AED only (n = 3385) % Non‐enzyme inducing AED only (n = 14 140) % Both types of AED (n = 1836) %
Any contraceptive methods 128 493 37.7%* 745 22.0% 4834 34.2% 352 19.2%
Second generation 28 995 22.6% 84 11.3% 771 16.0% 38 10.8%
Third generation 12 865 10.0% 55 7.4% 504 10.4% 37 10.5%
Fourth generation 27 888 21.7% 77 10.3% 908 18.8% 38 10.8%
Progestin‐only pill 17 018 13.2% 216 29.0% 919 19.0% 95 27.0%
Mirena device 7793 6.1% 126 16.9% 435 9.0% 63 17.9%
Patch/implant 5628 4.4% 24 3.2% 155 3.2% 9 2.6%
Combination of above 28 306 22.0% 163 21.9% 1142 23.6% 72 20.5%
With oestrogen content < 50 μg 82 071 97.7% 263 93.6% 2700 97.4% 131 95.6%
With oestrogen content > 50 μg 1951 2.3% 18 6.4 71 2.6% 6 4.4%
*

excluding AED users; assumed denominator (n = 340 981) for eligible population in December 2013, likely to be an under‐estimate for the number over the whole year.

P < 0.001 comparing any contraceptive in general population vs. enzyme‐inducing AED and vs. non‐enzyme‐inducing AED (chi‐square test); ~ comparison of enzyme‐inducing AED vs. general population for oestrogen content P < 0.001 (Fisher’s exact test).