Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 21;81(1):13–22. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12737

Table 2.

Quality assessment of individual study

Study Allocation sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding Loss to follow‐up Calculation of sample size Statistical analysis Intention‐to‐treat analysis Level of quality
Itoh et al. 21 A B B 0 Yes Student's t‐test or Mann–Whitney U‐test and the χ2 test Yes B
Rathi et al. 23 A A A 0 Yes Student's t‐test or Mann–Whitney U‐test and the χ2 test Yes A
Kumar et al. 5 A A A 6 Yes Bonferroni or Kruskal–Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney U test Yes A
Imperatore et al. 20 A A B 0 Yes Student's t‐test and the χ2 test Yes B
Itoh et al. 22 A B B 0 Yes Student's t‐test or Mann–Whitney U‐test and χ2 test Yes B
Gupta et al. [24] A A A 0 Yes Student's t‐test and χ2 test Yes A
Sur et al. 25 A A A 6 Yes Logistic regression, or Wilcoxon test and Kaplan–Meier analysis Yes A
Dell'Atti et al. 26 A B A 0 Yes Mann–Whitney and the Wilcoxon tests, or χ2 test Yes B

A all quality criteria met (adequate): low risk of bias. B one or more of the quality criteria only partly met (unclear): moderate risk of bias.

C one or more criteria not met (inadequate or not used): high risk of bias.