Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 9;140(6):1557–1566. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2914

Table 6.

—Multivariate Hierarchical Logistic Regression Model for Diagnostic Yield Per LN

All LNs (N = 1,819)
LNs From Patients With PET Scans (n = 839)
Variable OR 95% CI P Value OR 95% CI P Value
Hospital volume 1.002 1.000-1.004 .013 1.000 0.997-1.003 .90
Sex: male vs female 0.73 0.53-0.99 .045 0.84 0.53-1.32 .45
Smoking status: smoker vs never 1.45 1.02-2.06 .037 1.30 0.76-2.22 .34
Number of LN sites: > 2 vs 1 or 2 0.38 0.05-3.08 .11 0.40 0.25-0.65 < .001
Deep/general vs moderate anesthesia 0.91 0.57-1.46 .70 1.23 0.52-2.9 .63
On-site cytologic evaluation: yes vs no 0.90 0.56-1.44 .63 2.55 0.68-9.55 .11
Size of LN, cm
 ≤ 1 vs < 1-2 (reference) 0.29 0.21-0.39 < .001 0.33 0.21-0.53 < .001
 < 2-3 vs < 1-2 2.10 1.35-3.28 .001 1.52 0.7-3.31 .29
 > 3 vs < 1-2 2.05 1.08-3.91 .029 2.49 0.78-8.00 .12
Location of LN: 4L vs other 0.98 0.65-1.47 .91 1.17 0.65-2.11 .59
Linear EBUS-TBNA biopsy: yes vs no 2.05 0.80-5.27 .13 4.19 0.39-44.42 .19
PET scan: positive vs negative 4.30 2.57-7.18 < .001

On-site cytologic evaluation was treated as an LN-level variable. See Table 1 and 3 legends for expansion of abbreviations.