Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):18191–18196.

Table 1.

Summary of studies

First author Year Patients (No.) Ulcer area (cm2) History of ulcer Intervention measure Comparison intervention Follow-up time

TG CG
Gentzkow 1996 37 13 >1 ≥6 months Dermagraft CT 14 months
Richard 1997 109 126 >1 45 weeks Dermagraft CT 32 weeks
Veves 2001 112 96 1-16 ≥2 weeks Graftskin CT 3 months
Jason 2002 24 22 1-20 ≥2 weeks Dermagraft CT NR
Sams 2002 9 8 1-16 ≥2 weeks Graftskin CT 3 months
Caravaggi 2003 43 36 >2 ≥1 months Hyalograft CT 11 weeks
Marston 2003 130 115 1-20 ≥2 weeks Dermagraft CT 4 weeks
Luigi 2011 90 90 >1 ≥2 weeks Hyalograft CT 20 weeks

TG: Treatment group; CG: Control group; CT: Conventional treatment; NR: Not reported; Dermagraft: Human fibroblast-derived dermis; Graftskin: Living human skin equivalents; Hyalograft: HYAFF 11-based autologous dermal and epidermal grafts.